My New Blog

$8,000 Refund From IRS for First Time Homebuyers
August 11th, 2009 8:15 AM

URGENT: If you or someone you know is contemplating purchasing a home for the first time, know that they will get an $8,000 check within 60 days of closing from the IRS.

The three conditions are: (1) income should be less than $75,000 for a single person, or $150,000 for married couples, a(2) your escrow must close by November 30, 2009, and (3) eligible people are first time homebuyers.

Note:  Many properties are going into multiple offers right now, so if you are interested in participating, you need to time your transaction, typically a loan will take about 30 to 45 days to close.  Plan for delays in an escrow as it may happen to go over the 30 or 45 day escrow which is out of your control.  That means you need to get into escrow soon.  Get your calendar out and start planning! 

There is no better time to buy.  Why?  Prices have:

  • Dropped nearly 50% over the last 3 years,
  • Interest rates are incredibly LOW, and
  • You are getting $8,000 which, when you think about it can be part of your down payment

Benefits:

  • You are paying off "your" mortgage, not someone else's.
  • You are building equity - (built in forced saving)
  • Think of it as your retirement plan - in 30 years when you are a senior your loan is paid off!  You don't have monthly payments anymore!  Can you spell R-E-L-I-E-F. 
  • Now you have what $________ (what ever you paid as mortgage), as your monthly petty cash!  Wu-who!

Don't miss out on this opportunity $8,000 is a lot of money!  Call me or your realtor if you need help finding your home & investment.  Stop paying someone else's mortgage.

Dee (310) 435-4545.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on August 11th, 2009 8:15 AMPost a Comment (0)

Just Listed! 1375 Kelton Ave #102 Los Angeles, CA 90024
August 8th, 2009 6:48 PM
Header
Header_2
Listings Photo
$525,000.00
1375 Kelton Ave #102

Los Angeles, CA 90024



Beds: 2.0 Rooms: 0
Baths: 2.00 Sq. Ft.: 1304.00
Garage: 0 Built: 1981
 

This is a new listing that
I thought you might be
interested in. Visit this
listing online to see more
photos of the property,
Google Earth satellite
images, and much more.
 

If you have any questions
about this property or
require more information,
please feel free to call.

Doris Katsuda
Nelson Shelton & Associates
3104354545
www.losangelescityrealestate.com



 
  Visit this listing at Here

Posted by Doris Katsuda on August 8th, 2009 6:48 PMPost a Comment (0)

Rent vs. Buying
July 1st, 2009 1:12 PM

Have you ever wondered what the different is between buying and renting?  Check out the calculator on my website.  The "Rent vs. Buy" calculator is near the top, right side. 

I get this questions often, and it will help you to see what the numbers look like after taxes.  Plus you are paying off, month-by-month your home and your mortgage, not someone else's.  Someone once said, it's like a retirement plan... in 30 years you can pocket that monthly mortgage and view it as income.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on July 1st, 2009 1:12 PMPost a Comment (0)

Short-Pay Tax Consequence - What You Need To Know!
August 23rd, 2008 10:28 AM

I am consulting many people nearly ready to lose their home and tell them about the future tax consequence.  As for now if you are facing a short sale meaning you own more than what the house can sell for, the bank will forgive the difference. Typically they would treat that like income and you would get a 1099 at the end of the year which could be substantial.  Say if you owed $500,000 for your home and you sold it for $400,000, you would be taxed on the difference as if you made $100,000. 

Currently the tax relief program will NOT tax you.  This current relief program will go on till January 1, 2008. 

Below is an article I received from a Title Title Company - Jacki Ueng.

Tax Consequences of a "Short Sale"

vs

Foreclosure

Our nation is now seeing the effects of tightening mortgage credit after a liberal period. With increases in interest rates for adjustable rate mortgages and the conversion to amortization of principal for interest-only (or negative amortization) loans, home values for homes favored by subprime borrowers are collapsing, and the debtors are either trying to "walk away" from their homes and allowing them to be foreclosed or are making "short sales".

A "short sale" is selling the home for less than the mortgage balance and trying to get the lender to forgive the unpaid balance. This is a new use of the term, and is not the definition for this item in the Internal Revenue Code. In the tax law, a "short sale" is a sale of a borrowed item to be replaced at a future date, usually a security. There are no rulings that I am aware of with the term "short sale" applied to a real estate sale.

A reason for debtors to consider a "short sale" instead of a foreclosure is to try to protect their credit history.

How are foreclosures (and deeds in lieu of foreclosure) taxed?

An important consideration in the results of a foreclosure (or a deed in lieu of foreclosure) is whether the debt is "recourse" or "nonrecourse". If the debt is "recourse", the debtor is personally liable for the debt. If the debt is "nonrecourse", the debt is only secured by the property, and the debtor is not personally liable for the balance.

You should consult with an attorney to determine the status of your mortgage. In California, most mortgages that are used to purchase a residence are nonrecourse, but mortgages from refinancing a previous mortgage are usually recourse.

When a nonrecourse mortgage is foreclosed, the property is treated as being sold for the balance of the mortgage. (G. Hammel, SCt, 41-1 USTC ¶ 9169.) This is important because the gain from a foreclosure of a principal residence may be eligible for the $250,000 ($500,000 for jointly-owned marital property) exclusion.

For example, for foreclosure of a nonrecourse debt,

Nonrecourse debt

$500,000

Tax basis (cost to determine tax gain or loss)

300,000

Gain

$200,000

If the holding period requirements are met and the residence was a principal residence, the above gain would be tax-free.

(Note: The above example is for consistency and contrast with the results for recourse debt. Most non-recourse debt for a residence is purchase-money debt, and would not exceed the tax basis (purchase price) of the residence. When the residence was a replacement residence for a principal residence sold before May 7, 1997, the tax basis can be less than the cost of the residence. Most of the mortgages for residences acquired in that scenario have probably been refinanced and are now recourse debt.)

For recourse debt, the debt is only satisfied up to the fair market value of the property. There is a sale up to that amount. If the lender forgives the balance of the mortgage, there is cancellation of debt income, which is taxed as ordinary income. (Regulations § 1.61-12.) (But see tax relief enacted for certain recourse debt secured by a principal residence, below.)

For example, for foreclosure of a recourse debt,

Recourse debt

$500,000

Fair market value

450,000

Cancellation of debt (ordinary income)

$ 50,000

(If the cancellation of debt was for "qualified principal residence indebtedness", it will be excluded from taxable income. If the taxpayer still owns the home after the cancellation of debt, the excluded amount will be subtracted from the tax basis of the residence. See the section on "tax relief", below.)

Fair market value

$450,000

Tax basis

300,000

Gain

$150,000

Again, if the holding period requirements are met and the residence was a principal residence the above gain would be tax-free, but the cancellation of debt would generally be taxable as ordinary income, except for certain "qualified principal residence indebtedness." See the section on "tax relief", below.

Tax relief enacted for recourse mortgage on principal residence debt forgiveness.

Congress has passed and President Bush has approved H.R. 3648, the "Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007." The legislation is effective for discharges of indebtedness on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2010. (As I write this, the California legislature has legislative proposals to conform, but California has not yet conformed to this legislation. Check whether your state has conformed.)

Under the new law, a discharge of "qualified principal residence indebtedness" is excluded from taxable income. "Qualified principal residence indebtedness" is acquisition indebtedness secured by the principal residence of a taxpayer as defined for the deduction of residential mortgage interest, but the limit is $2,000,000 for the exclusion ($1,000,000 for the mortgage interest deduction) and $1,000,000 for married persons filing a separate return ($500,000 for the mortgage interest deduction). Also, the exclusion only applies to a mortgage secured by the principal residence of the taxpayer.

The election to exclude the income from discharge of principal residence indebtedness is made on Form 982 (Re. February 2008), Part I, lines 1.e and 2. According to IRS Publication 4681, a basis reduction amount is entered at Part II, like 10.b. only if the taxpayer still owns the residence after the debt cancellation. IRS Publications aren't considered legal authority and I haven't found any other authority for not making a basis adjustment when the debt cancellation happens at the same time as a foreclosure or short sale.

The exclusion does not apply if the discharge relates to providing services to the lender or any other factor not related to a decline in the value of the residence or the financial condition of the taxpayer/borrower.

According to IRS Publication 4681, if the taxpayer continues to own the home after the debt cancellation, the tax basis of the residence (cost used to determine taxable gain or loss on sale) is reduced by any amount of discharge of indebtedness excluded from taxable income, but not below zero. There is no basis adjustment if the debt cancellation happens with a foreclosure or short sale. There will be two calculations. (1) Cancellation of debt income eligible for exclusion. (2) Sale of residence to apply applicable exclusion.

The new exclusion of income for discharge of acquisition indebtedness for a principal residence takes precedence over the exclusion relating to insolvency, unless the taxpayer elects otherwise.

For example, if the previous example for a recourse debt was eligible for the exclusion, here are the tax results:

Recourse debt

$500,000

Fair market value

450,000

Cancellation of debt excluded from taxable income

150,000

Fair market value

$450,000

Tax basis

$300,000

Gain

150,000

If the holding period requirements are met, the above gain would qualify for the exclusion ($500,000 married, joint or $250,000 single) for sale of a principal residence.

(Remember the foreclosure of a non-recourse mortgage is not a discharge of indebtedness, but a "sale" of the residence in satisfaction of the mortgage. Therefore, such a foreclosure won't qualify for the new exclusion, but may qualify for the exclusion of gain for sale of a principal residence. Also, since the balance of acquisition indebtedness is almost always less than the tax basis (cost) of the residence, it would be highly unusual for there to be a gain from a foreclosure.)

What happens with a "short sale"?

Short sales are taxed under the same rules as foreclosures.

Recourse debt cancellation is not satisfied with the surrender of the property, so any debt not satisfied with the sale proceeds would be taxable as cancellation of debt income, except for certain "qualified principal residence indebtedness."

Therefore, the tax consequences would be similar to the "recourse debt" example, above. The buyer and seller might also have legal concerns about whether the lender would consent to the transaction and whether (for recourse debt) the lender would in fact forgive the debt.

For example, for a recourse debt short sale,

Net sale proceeds

$450,000

Tax basis

300,000

Gain

$150,000

Debt

$500,000

Pay off using net sale proceeds

450,000

Cancellation of debt (ordinary income)

$ 50,000

(If the cancellation of debt was for "qualified principal residence indebtedness," it will be excluded from taxable income and be subtracted from the tax basis of the residence.)

For non-recourse debt short sales when the seller and buyer require the cancellation of the debt by the lender as a condition of the sale, the debt cancellation is included in the sale proceeds, like for a foreclosure.

Therefore, a "short sale" can be a viable alternative to a foreclosure for debtors with nonrecourse debt and who qualify for the exclusion from income of the gain from the sale of a principal residence.

What about selling expenses for a recourse mortgage?

For simplicity, I have disregarded selling expenses in the above discussion. For a short sale, selling expenses reduce the sales proceeds available to reduce the loan. For a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, selling expenses are added to the debt. The net result should be similar, assuming the fair market value of the property equals the selling price for a short sale.

For example, for foreclosure of a recourse debt,

Recourse mortgage balance

$500,000

Selling expenses

50,000

Total debt

$550,000

Fair market value

450,000

Cancellation of debt (ordinary income)

$100,000

(If the cancellation of debt was for "qualified principal residence indebtedness," it will be excluded from taxable income. According to IRS Publication 4681, if the cancellation of indebtedness happened relating to a short sale, no basis adjustment would be required. If the taxpayer still owned the hoome after teh debt cancellation, the exclusion amount would be subtracted from the tax basis of the residence. See the section on "tax relief" above.)

Fair market value

$450,000

Tax basis

-300,000

Selling expenses

-50,000

Gain

$100,000

For example, for a recourse debt short sale,

Sales price

$450,000

Selling expenses

-50,000

Tax basis

-300,000

Gain

$100,000

Recourse mortgage balance

$500,000

Pay off using net sale proceeds
($450,000 sales price - $50,000
selling expenses)

400,000

Cancellation of debt (ordinary income)

$100,000

(Same caveat for "qualified principal residence indebtedness" as above.)

Other exceptions for cancellation of debt income.

Cancellation of debt income may not be taxable if the debtor is insolvent or has the debt discharged in bankruptcy. With recent changes in the federal bankruptcy laws, it is much harder for individuals to file bankruptcy than before the changes.

What if the fair market value of the home has dropped after purchase?

Example - Non-recourse foreclosure/short sale

Mortgage balance

$500,000

Tax basis

700,000

Loss

-$200,000

(The fair market value of the property is disregarded for a non-recourse mortgage.)

If this is a principal residence, the loss is a non-deductible personal loss.

Example - Recourse foreclosure/short sale

Mortgage balance

$500,000

Fair market value

450,000

Cancellation of debt income

$ 50,000

(If the cancellation of debt was for "qualified principal residence indebtedness," it will be excluded from taxable income and be subtracted from the tax basis of the residence. See section on "tax relief" above.)

Fair market value

$450,000

Tax basis

$700,000

Loss (for personal residence, non-deductible)

-250,000

Senator Grassley asks IRS to help homeowners with loan forgiveness tax bills.

Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who is the ranking minority member on the Senate Finance Committee, has sent a letter to the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service asking for help for homeowners who face big tax bills because of home loan debt forgiveness on a principal residence. Grassley asked that the IRS accept offers in compromise to eliminate or reduce the taxes for these transactions.

Grassley reminded the IRS that they may compromise to promote effective tax administration where compelling public policy or equity considerations identified by the taxpayer provide a sufficient basis for compromising the liability.

(Similar requests were ignored when taxpayers suffered tax disasters relating to stock option transactions during the stock market crash of 2000 and 2001.)

For more information, there are explanations about foreclosures and cancellation of debt in IRS Publications 523, Selling Your Home; 552, Taxable and Nontaxable Income; and 544, Sales and Other Dispositions of Assets at www.irs.gov.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on August 23rd, 2008 10:28 AMPost a Comment (0)

Just Listed! 3621 Virginia Road Los Angeles, CA 90016
March 10th, 2008 11:05 AM
Header
Header_2
Listings Photo
$450,000.00
3621 Virginia Road

Los Angeles, CA 90016



Beds: 2.0 Rooms: 2
Baths: 2.00 Sq. Ft.: 1422.00
Garage: 2.0 Built: 1948
 

This is a new listing that
I thought you might be
interested in. Visit this
listing online to see more
photos of the property,
Google Earth satellite
images, and much more.
 

If you have any questions
about this property or
require more information,
please feel free to call.

Doris Katsuda
Nelson Shelton & Associates
3104354545
www.losangelescityrealestate.com



 
  Visit this listing at Here

Posted by Doris Katsuda on March 10th, 2008 11:05 AMPost a Comment (0)

Just Listed! 1630 S. Bentley Ave #102 Los Angeles, CA 90025
January 11th, 2008 7:45 PM
Header
Header_2
Listings Photo
$725,000.00
1630 S. Bentley Ave #102

Los Angeles, CA 90025



Beds: 2.0 Rooms: 2
Baths: 2.00 Sq. Ft.: 1788.00
Garage: 0 Built: 0
 

This is a new listing that
I thought you might be
interested in. Visit this
listing online to see more
photos of the property,
Google Earth satellite
images, and much more.
 

If you have any questions
about this property or
require more information,
please feel free to call.

Doris Katsuda
Nelson Shelton & Associates
3104354545
www.losangelescityrealestate.com



 
  Visit this listing at Here

Posted by Doris Katsuda on January 11th, 2008 7:45 PMPost a Comment (0)

DOM - Days On The Market....
August 14th, 2007 10:12 AM
 

You Must Know Your "DOM" (days on the market) when deciding to list and sell your home.

Before you can nail down the price of a home you want to buy, or price a home you are looking to sell, you need to look at comparable sales or “comps”.  However, most novices don’t look at comps in their proper context, that is, in relation to the amount of time it took to sell (“Days on Market” or “D.O.M.”).

For example, a market in which a house sells for $250,000 in three weeks is quite different from a market in which the same house sells in six months (the latter is known as a “soft market”). In a soft market, sellers can either drop prices, give concessions, or wait longer for their houses to sell. The concessions factor is important because it will allow you to calculate the “net” sales price.  This is particularly important if you are using new builder homes as your comparable sale.

You can find out the days on market for a home, as well as the average time for similar homes in a neighborhood by asking a real estate broker to search through the multiple listing service (“MLS”).  Make sure you’re comparing apples to apples—that is, the average days on market for houses in the same area and in the same price range. If the broker has access to the right information on the MLS, you can compare renovated versus non-renovated homes to get a more detailed analysis, as well as concessions offered on the comparable sales. 

I say this because I have a friend who bought a home and renovated.  I've asked him what is the average DOM - he says he doesn't know.  I mentioned that it has to be taken into consideration, but I think it just kind of skimmed over his head.  Well a month later he says it is still sitting there and I have reduced the price.  I told him to do a study with his realtor to see what the DOM is because that will play a role in how he wants to price the home.  I bet he is thinking that Georgia is like Los Angeles, and it's not.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on August 14th, 2007 10:12 AMPost a Comment (0)

Inspection - What Happens If There Are Problems Found....
July 19th, 2007 12:09 PM

Issues Discovered Through Inspection:

Real estate purchase contracts usually include an inspection contingency to protect the buyers. The contingency, which typically runs for 10 to 14 days from acceptance of the contract, gives the buyers the right to have the property inspected to their satisfaction.

Often defects are discovered during these inspections that neither the buyers nor sellers were aware of before they entered into an agreement. Who's responsible for fixing these defects? The answer isn't always clear.

State laws vary considerably regarding a seller's responsibility to the buyer when a property is sold. Many states have seller disclosure requirements, but many don't. The terms of the purchase contract also vary. Some purchase contracts are "as is" with respect to property condition, others include a "seller warranty" clause.

With an "as is" purchase, the sellers usually aren't obligated to fix defects that are discovered during the buyers' inspections. Still, depending on how the contract is worded, the buyers probably won't have to go through with the purchase if the inspections are unsatisfactory.

When the purchase contract includes a "seller warranty" clause, the sellers may be obligated to fix certain defects that are discovered during the buyer's inspections. For example, the seller warranty clause might obligate the sellers to provide a furnace that is in working order. If the buyer's home inspector finds that the furnace isn't operating, the sellers may have to fix it before the deal closes.

First-Time Tip: Frequently buyers and sellers have to renegotiate the contract after the buyers complete their inspections. Suppose the buyers' home inspector thinks the roof looks like it's at the end of its life. He suggests that the buyers hire a licensed roofer to inspect the roof.

A roofer does an inspection and diagnoses that the roof needs to be replaced before the next rainy season. He issues a roofing proposal for the job in the amount of $5,000.

But the sellers insist that the roof is watertight and that they haven't had any leaks. Furthermore, they feel the buyers paid such a low price that they can't afford to pay for a new roof.

The buyers hadn't anticipated putting a new roof on the house at any time in the near future when they made their offer. They're leveraged to the hilt and have barely enough cash for the down payment and closing costs.

Both buyers and sellers want to keep the deal together, so they consult more roofers, one of whom is willing to repair the roof for $700. Repaired, the roof should last another few years. The sellers offer to pay for the repairs and the buyers accept.

One of the main reasons that home purchase transactions fall apart is due to defects that materialize during the course of the buyers' inspections. Ideally, both buyers and sellers will work together to resolve these problems. The alternative is to start the process all over.

The wording of inspection contingency clauses varies from one contract to the next. Some clauses state that if the buyers find unsatisfactory property defects that the sellers are unable or unwilling to correct, the contract can be cancelled. Other inspection contingencies give the buyers the unilateral right to disapprove the inspections for any reason, without necessarily giving the sellers an opportunity to correct the problems.

The Closing: Buyers might prefer to have the right to back out of the contract if defects materialize during inspections. But a contract that provides for further dialogue between both parties if problems arise is in keeping with the spirit of good faith and mutual cooperation.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on July 19th, 2007 12:09 PMPost a Comment (0)

Seniors and Reverse Mortgages...
July 1st, 2007 11:58 AM
WHAT IS A REVERSE MORTGAGE? Just the opposite of an amortized mortgage, which requires the borrower to make monthly payments over 15 to 30 years, a reverse mortgage pays money to the borrower whenever needed and requires no repayment until the homeowner sells the home, moves out for longer than 12 months or dies.

When one of those events occurs, the reverse-mortgage principal and accrued interest "matures" and becomes payable in full. If the homeowner dies, the heirs can sell the home, pay off the reverse mortgage and keep the remaining equity. Or, if the heirs want to retain the residence, they can obtain a new mortgage to pay off the reverse mortgage.

Contrary to widespread myth, the reverse-mortgage lender does not "own" the home. The lender can never force the senior citizen homeowner to sell or move out. The reason is reverse mortgages are "non-recourse" without any personal liability. Only the residence is responsible for eventual repayment, even if it loses market value or the borrower lives to be 110.

To qualify for a reverse mortgage, the homeowner must be at least 62. If any co-owner is younger than 62, the residence is not eligible unless the under-62 co-owner signs a quitclaim deed conveying his/her interest to the over-62 co-owner. When there are two co-owners, both aged 62 or older, reverse-mortgage eligibility is based on the age of the youngest co-owner.

Advanced age is an advantage when obtaining a reverse mortgage. The reason is the borrower's life expectancy determines the amount the homeowner can receive. For example, due to a shorter life expectancy, an 80-year-old homeowner will qualify for larger reverse-mortgage payments than will a 62-year-young "whippersnapper."

THREE TYPES OF REVERSE-MORTGAGE PAYMENTS. Reverse-mortgage borrowers have a choice of how to receive their money. The alternatives are (1) lifetime monthly income (called "tenure"); (2) a lump sum for any purpose (such as a new roof or a trip around the world); and/or (3) a credit line for future borrowing (except in Texas). Most reverse-mortgage borrowers select the credit line.

Or, the senior citizen homeowner can select any combination of these choices, such as one-half monthly payments, one-fourth lump sum and one-fourth credit line. Borrowers can change their choice at any time by notifying the loan servicer.

A REVERSE MORTGAGE MUST BE A FIRST MORTGAGE. Because a reverse mortgage has a growing balance, due to principal advances and accrued interest, it must be recorded as a first mortgage.

If the home has an existing first mortgage, it can be paid off with a reverse-mortgage lump sum. As a very general rule, if the existing first mortgage plus any other liens such as a home equity loan or an IRS tax lien exceed 40 percent of the home's market value, the residence usually will not be eligible for a reverse mortgage.

Many senior citizen homeowners obtain reverse mortgages to pay off their existing mortgage balances. The happy result is they get rid of their monthly mortgage payments, thus increasing their monthly cash flow, since a reverse mortgage requires no monthly payments.

FOUR REVERSE-MORTGAGE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
The three major nationwide reverse-mortgage lenders are very different, but they all use the same eligibility criteria to determine how much cash the senior homeowner can obtain.

The criteria are: (a) the adjustable interest rate at the time the reverse mortgage is originated (all reverse mortgages use adjustable interest rates); (b) the age of the youngest homeowner (minimum age is 62); (c) the lender's appraised market value of the home; and (d) the lender's maximum mortgage limit.

The borrower's income and credit rating don't matter, but the homeowner must not be currently involved in a bankruptcy, and the residence must meet minimum standards.

THE THREE MAJOR NATIONWIDE REVERSE-MORTGAGE LENDERS. Each of the three major nationwide reverse-mortgage lenders offers very different programs.

The most popular, with approximately 90 percent of the market, is the FHA plan. However, the major FHA drawback is the low lending limits, which vary by county. Borrowers owning homes in expensive communities are often disappointed with FHA.

Higher lending limits, currently up to $417,000, are offered by the Fannie Mae "Home Keeper" reverse mortgage. But the cash available is often less than the FHA program.

However, Fannie Mae is the only lender offering a "reverse mortgage for home purchase" where the senior citizen home buyer won't have any monthly payments.

Financial Freedom Plan (FFP) offers reverse mortgages with no maximum limit for their "jumbo cash account." The result is owners of homes worth more than $500,000 can usually obtain the largest amount with an FFP reverse mortgage.

HOW TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH CASH YOU CAN OBTAIN. Because there are three major variables to consider -- the homeowner's age, the home's fair market value, and the reverse-mortgage lender's maximum lending limit

Posted by Doris Katsuda on July 1st, 2007 11:58 AMPost a Comment (0)

What Is Typically Included?
June 18th, 2007 1:26 PM

Decoding real estate's law of fixtures

During this peak home sales season, when thousands of houses and condominiums will be sold, buyers and sellers need to be aware of what is legally included and excluded from their sale.

Most experienced real estate agents have horror stories about "fixtures," which the seller removed but the buyer thought were included in the sale.

To illustrate, my mother was a mild-mannered woman. Only once did I ever hear her raise her voice. I was helping mom and dad move into their condominium. As I walked down the hallway to the condo carrying some boxes, I heard her scream as she entered the condo, "Where is the chandelier?"

The seller had removed the dining room chandelier. Even my dad was surprised.

Fortunately, a phone call to the real estate agent resolved the problem, the seller sheepishly restored the chandelier, and everyone lived happily ever after.

That typical example shows how important fixtures can be in a home sale.

THE SIMPLE REAL ESTATE LAW OF FIXTURES. Most home buyers and sellers, and even their real estate agents, often do not understand the simple law of fixtures.

A "fixture" is moveable personal property, which, by means of bolts, nails, screws, cement, glue, or other attachment method, has been converted to real property. Clearly, that dining room chandelier had been converted from personal property to real property because of its permanent attachment to the structure. Nothing was said in the sales contract about its exclusion from the condo sale.

A more troublesome example can be window coverings. Suppose a house or condo has beautiful draperies and attached wood window blinds. Those draperies hang by hooks from a drapery rod that is screwed into the wall.

The law of fixtures says the draperies are personal property because they can be easily removed without damage, but the drapery rods are fixtures included in the home sale. The wood window blinds, if permanently attached to the structure, are considered fixtures, which are included in the home sale.

But the printed sales contract can change the result. Most well-written home sales contract forms specify "window coverings" are included in the sales price (unless otherwise excluded).

REMOVE IT IF YOU DON'T WANT IT INCLUDED IN THE SALE. As longtime real estate agents know, the worst thing a home seller can do is hang a sign on a fixture stating the seller wants to exclude it from the sale.

Having bought many rental houses, I recall seeing little signs hanging from the dining room chandelier, or pasted on the front of the dishwasher, saying, "This item not included."

That is like waving a red flag in front of a bull. Unless the item is junk, the buyer will then insist on receiving that fixture as part of the home-purchase price.

A better approach for home sellers is to remove the item before exposing the house or condo to prospective buyers. Removing the dining room chandelier and installing a tasteful replacement is far better.

For example, last year I recall inspecting an $18 million estate where the seller had removed the built-in kitchen appliances. Frankly, I thought that was "tacky." But I was not a serious buyer so I didn't bring up the issue with the listing agent.

MY FAVORITE FIXTURE STORY. Years ago, in the small town where I live, a large house was listed for sale. One of its primary features was the beautiful rose garden.

After the house sale closed and the buyer obtained title, imagine the buyer's shock to discover the seller had removed all the beautiful rose plants. That seller obviously understood the law of fixtures.

Plants and trees growing in the ground are considered to be fixtures because they are permanently attached to the land by roots. However, because the rose plants were in large pots, the seller was legally entitled to remove them since they were not permanently attached to the real property.

AVOID FIXTURE TROUBLE WITH A WELL-WRITTEN SALES CONTRACT. When a home buyer spots non-fixture items, such as patio furniture, which the buyer wants included in the home sales price, the buyer must itemize that personal property in the sales contract to have it included in the sales price.

Similarly, if the seller wants to exclude any fixtures that are attached to the structure, those items must be itemized in the written contract otherwise they are automatically included in the sale.

Troublesome items to consider include: track lighting, fireplace inserts and equipment, solar systems, built-in appliances, screens, awnings, shutters, window coverings, attached floor coverings, TV antennas, satellite dishes and related equipment, telephone and Internet wiring, window air conditioners, pool-spa equipment, water softeners, security systems, keys to all locks, garage door openers and remote controls, mailbox, and landscaping equipment.

FIVE LEGAL RULES IF A FIXTURE DISPUTE GOES TO COURT.
If a lawsuit develops over an item that the buyer thought was an included fixture, but the seller removed, five basic legal rules generally apply:

1. METHOD OF ATTACHMENT. The most important fixture rule is the method of attachment. If the item is permanently attached to the structure, it is legally considered to be a fixture, which is included in the home's sales price.

However, if an item can be removed without damage to the structure, such as draperies, it is not a fixture. Examples include unscrewing light bulbs and unplugging a refrigerator because both are personal property not permanently attached to the building.

The item's weight is immaterial. To illustrate, an aboveground swimming pool is removable personal property unless it is surrounded by a permanent structure, thus making it a real property fixture.

2. INTENT OF THE BUYER AND SELLER. If the written sales contract is indefinite, in a court trial the intent of the buyer and seller become pivotal.

For example, when the multiple listing service (MLS) listing specifies a "beautiful kitchen with the latest appliances," that implies the seller intends to include those appliances and the buyer can rely on that statement. Or a description of the beautiful swimming pool can be interpreted to mean the seller plans to include the pool cover and equipment.

3. ADAPTABILITY TO PROPERTY USE. When personal property is built into a home, it indicates it has become a fixture, which is included in the sales price.

To illustrate, when I bought my home there were built-in stereo speakers on each side of the den fireplace. Although nothing was said in the sales contract, I would have been very upset if the sellers removed those speakers. However, they did unplug their stereo equipment and I had to buy new stereo components.

4. AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. A written contract that lists a specific item, whether it is a fixture or personal property, usually prevails to make it included in the sales price. If in doubt, buyers should list any questionable items.

5. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. As a general rule, if a lawsuit develops, courts tend to favor a) buyer over seller, b) tenant over landlord, and c) lender over borrower.

TRADE FIXTURES ARE AN EXCEPTION. The fixture rules explained above apply to residential sales. However, when a commercial business property is sold, the business tenant is entitled to remove business trade fixtures.

Examples include restaurant equipment, outdoor business signs, display cabinets, a bank vault, and a tavern bar. However, the business seller or tenant must restore the premises to its pre-lease or pre-sale condition.

SUMMARY: A well-written sales contract can prevent fixture problems by clarifying what is included or excluded from a real estate sale. For more details, please consult a local real estate attorney.


Posted by Doris Katsuda on June 18th, 2007 1:26 PMPost a Comment (0)

Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Nelson Shelton & Associates 355 North Canon Dr. Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Phone:

Free MLS Search | My Blog

Copyright © 2010 Nelson Shelton & Associates
Portions Copyright © 2010 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map
All rate, payment, and area information are estimates and approximations only.